Alert42 generates 8 opps and $298k in revenue in 3 months

In partnership with:
Featuring
Featuring
How are you going to stand out in 2026?
Buyers are in control of the buying process. Over 70% of it is happening online. And they are putting companies on their short list of vendors that provide value and establish trust with their content.
How are you accounting for this in your 2026 strategy?
You need to stand out. To make sure your buyers notice you. Let us help you build that into your strategy for next year -->
Alert42 generates 8 opps and $298k in revenue in 3 months

52% of target accounts
8 opportunities
"After this we'd trust Inverta with absolutely anything. Hands down, the most successful run at ABM we've had so far."
Sonia Shah
The Revenue Marketer

Alert42 generates 8 opps and $298k in revenue in 3 months
Still chasing 10% efficiency gains?
2023-2025 were the years of experimentation with AI. 2026 is the year to make it transformative. If you're still trying to figure out the strategic advantage AI will bring to your team, we're here to help!
This developer alert software had recently gone public and was looking for new, more sustainable streams of revenue. They formed an internal account-based marketing (ABM) council and started to convene marketing, sales, success, and product. But after initial excitement, the council stalled out.
Everyone was aware in theory how account-based would work, but with so many deals in motion, sales and finance were hesitant to experiment and risk any earnings. Further, nobody was quite sure how exactly the sales and marketing teams should collaborate on plays. Sales thought it was a marketing program, and marketing thought it was primarily a sales program.
It started to feel like someone would have to compromise. The VP of marketing, Sheri, had worked with Inverta several times prior and called us in to help take ownership of the program and help her get the pilot into production.
Top of funnel engagement, but where was the progression?
When we entered, the ABM council was running a few programs but they were very much just demand generation tactics applied to accounts. And in that sense, it was working. They were getting good upfront engagement, but the accounts weren’t progressing. They also didn’t have strong measurements, so sales and marketing were living in their own systems and would spar over whether an “account” was qualified.
We expanded the council. We helped Sheri convince the demand generation, marketing operations, finance, and data analytics teams to be more involved. This added more people and made scheduling harder, but it was worth it because all the progress was dying when things got referred to sub-committees. Marketing operations had been more or less denying requests because their tech stack wasn’t set up for an account-based motion, and they didn’t understand the need. And finance was fixated on treating marketing qualified accounts (MQAs) like leads. Only through talking as one expanded group over months did we all reach greater clarity and, ultimately, alignment.
We advanced the program with decks that made the plays linear and visible: Deck slides that said, “This is what you’ll do at this stage, and here’s what marketing is responsible for, and here’s what you can expect for focusing on this account with us.”
Then sales started to lose confidence, which is not unusual. Two regional sales leaders started to feel that all this planning wasn’t converting into deals they could work and stopped allowing their managers to attend council meetings. We encouraged Sheri to keep it up—and she did. She kept bringing them back to the table and reestablishing momentum with a three-month pilot where both teams could prove out whether the changes were worth it, and then they’d all decide.
The pilot paid off spectacularly
Alert42 saw momentous early results, which is part skill and part timing. It’s rare for accounts the of size they were targeting to engage quickly, but the messages aligned with sudden industry news and things worked in our favor.
Because of the dashboard we’d built in the CRM, everyone could view account progression, and that, more than anything, is what made it real. Sales created eight opportunities from those major accounts in the first three months and closed one deal worth $298k. That set off alarm bells—or gong bells, rather—in sales. Suddenly, everyone wanted account-based coverage, and the tone and mood shifted.
Now, Alert42 has an expanded account-based motion and active engagement from their sales and marketing operations teams.
About the author
Service page feature
Account-based marketing
This developer alert software had recently gone public and was looking for new, more sustainable streams of revenue. They formed an internal account-based marketing (ABM) council and started to convene marketing, sales, success, and product. But after initial excitement, the council stalled out.
Everyone was aware in theory how account-based would work, but with so many deals in motion, sales and finance were hesitant to experiment and risk any earnings. Further, nobody was quite sure how exactly the sales and marketing teams should collaborate on plays. Sales thought it was a marketing program, and marketing thought it was primarily a sales program.
It started to feel like someone would have to compromise. The VP of marketing, Sheri, had worked with Inverta several times prior and called us in to help take ownership of the program and help her get the pilot into production.
Top of funnel engagement, but where was the progression?
When we entered, the ABM council was running a few programs but they were very much just demand generation tactics applied to accounts. And in that sense, it was working. They were getting good upfront engagement, but the accounts weren’t progressing. They also didn’t have strong measurements, so sales and marketing were living in their own systems and would spar over whether an “account” was qualified.
We expanded the council. We helped Sheri convince the demand generation, marketing operations, finance, and data analytics teams to be more involved. This added more people and made scheduling harder, but it was worth it because all the progress was dying when things got referred to sub-committees. Marketing operations had been more or less denying requests because their tech stack wasn’t set up for an account-based motion, and they didn’t understand the need. And finance was fixated on treating marketing qualified accounts (MQAs) like leads. Only through talking as one expanded group over months did we all reach greater clarity and, ultimately, alignment.
We advanced the program with decks that made the plays linear and visible: Deck slides that said, “This is what you’ll do at this stage, and here’s what marketing is responsible for, and here’s what you can expect for focusing on this account with us.”
Then sales started to lose confidence, which is not unusual. Two regional sales leaders started to feel that all this planning wasn’t converting into deals they could work and stopped allowing their managers to attend council meetings. We encouraged Sheri to keep it up—and she did. She kept bringing them back to the table and reestablishing momentum with a three-month pilot where both teams could prove out whether the changes were worth it, and then they’d all decide.
The pilot paid off spectacularly
Alert42 saw momentous early results, which is part skill and part timing. It’s rare for accounts the of size they were targeting to engage quickly, but the messages aligned with sudden industry news and things worked in our favor.
Because of the dashboard we’d built in the CRM, everyone could view account progression, and that, more than anything, is what made it real. Sales created eight opportunities from those major accounts in the first three months and closed one deal worth $298k. That set off alarm bells—or gong bells, rather—in sales. Suddenly, everyone wanted account-based coverage, and the tone and mood shifted.
Now, Alert42 has an expanded account-based motion and active engagement from their sales and marketing operations teams.
Resources
About the author
Service page feature
Account-based marketing
Alert42 generates 8 opps and $298k in revenue in 3 months

Speakers
Other helpful resources
This developer alert software had recently gone public and was looking for new, more sustainable streams of revenue. They formed an internal account-based marketing (ABM) council and started to convene marketing, sales, success, and product. But after initial excitement, the council stalled out.
Everyone was aware in theory how account-based would work, but with so many deals in motion, sales and finance were hesitant to experiment and risk any earnings. Further, nobody was quite sure how exactly the sales and marketing teams should collaborate on plays. Sales thought it was a marketing program, and marketing thought it was primarily a sales program.
It started to feel like someone would have to compromise. The VP of marketing, Sheri, had worked with Inverta several times prior and called us in to help take ownership of the program and help her get the pilot into production.
Top of funnel engagement, but where was the progression?
When we entered, the ABM council was running a few programs but they were very much just demand generation tactics applied to accounts. And in that sense, it was working. They were getting good upfront engagement, but the accounts weren’t progressing. They also didn’t have strong measurements, so sales and marketing were living in their own systems and would spar over whether an “account” was qualified.
We expanded the council. We helped Sheri convince the demand generation, marketing operations, finance, and data analytics teams to be more involved. This added more people and made scheduling harder, but it was worth it because all the progress was dying when things got referred to sub-committees. Marketing operations had been more or less denying requests because their tech stack wasn’t set up for an account-based motion, and they didn’t understand the need. And finance was fixated on treating marketing qualified accounts (MQAs) like leads. Only through talking as one expanded group over months did we all reach greater clarity and, ultimately, alignment.
We advanced the program with decks that made the plays linear and visible: Deck slides that said, “This is what you’ll do at this stage, and here’s what marketing is responsible for, and here’s what you can expect for focusing on this account with us.”
Then sales started to lose confidence, which is not unusual. Two regional sales leaders started to feel that all this planning wasn’t converting into deals they could work and stopped allowing their managers to attend council meetings. We encouraged Sheri to keep it up—and she did. She kept bringing them back to the table and reestablishing momentum with a three-month pilot where both teams could prove out whether the changes were worth it, and then they’d all decide.
The pilot paid off spectacularly
Alert42 saw momentous early results, which is part skill and part timing. It’s rare for accounts the of size they were targeting to engage quickly, but the messages aligned with sudden industry news and things worked in our favor.
Because of the dashboard we’d built in the CRM, everyone could view account progression, and that, more than anything, is what made it real. Sales created eight opportunities from those major accounts in the first three months and closed one deal worth $298k. That set off alarm bells—or gong bells, rather—in sales. Suddenly, everyone wanted account-based coverage, and the tone and mood shifted.
Now, Alert42 has an expanded account-based motion and active engagement from their sales and marketing operations teams.
